Assembly magazine
Home
Online
Industry Headlines
AssemblyBlog
ASSEMBLYtv
Buyers Guide
Showrooms
Product Review
How To Guides
Webinar
Ask ASSEMBLY
Calendar of Events
eNewsletter
Current Issue
Cover Story
Features
Departments
Digital Edition
Resources
Podcasts
Archives
Job Search
White Papers
Industry Links
Contract Assembly Services
Website Review
E-Cards
Market Research
List Rental
Classified Ads
ASSEMBLY Info
Advertise
Subscribe
About Assembly
Staff Directory
Editorial Calendar
Reprints
2008 Plant of the Year Nomination Form
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Email this Article Print View
Select a Robotic Tool Changer

March 11, 2008



The Purpose of a Robotic Tool Changer
Robotic tool changers provide flexibility to robotic applications by enabling the robot to change end-effectors automatically (e.g.; grippers, vacuum cup tooling, pneumatic and electric motors, weld guns, etc.). Tool changers consist of a master plate, which is mounted to the robot arm, and a tool plate, which is mounted to the end-effector. The tool changer passes utilities such as pneumatics, electrical signals, fluids, and more from the robot arm to the end-effector.

Benefits of Using a Robotic Tool Changer
  • Production lines are changed over in seconds instead of hours.
  • Tools are quickly changed for maintenance and repair, drastically reducing downtime.
  • Flexibility is maximized by using more than one end-effector in an application.
  • Tooling is simplified by replacing heavy and large multi-tool end-effectors with individual tools that are automatically exchanged.
Selecting the Proper Robotic Tool Changer
A key feature to look for when selecting a robotic tool changer is a reliable and repeatable locking mechanism to lock the master plate to the tool plate. Another very important feature to consider is a fail-safe mechanism (preferably one that does not use a spring) to ensure the tool stays coupled to the master in the event that air pressure or power is lost. Tool changers have a payload rating which is compared to the weight of the end-effector and the payload capacity of the robot. Selecting a tool changer based on payload alone will provide a starting point, but the most important factor is moment capacity. Calculate the static moment load of the end-effector and select a tool changer with a static moment capacity equal to or greater than the calculated static moment load.

Calculating the Static Moment Load
The most accurate selection of a tool changer model is made by calculating the static moment load of the end-effector.

Use the following to approximate the worst-case static moment:
a) Find the approximate center-of-gravity (CG) of the heaviest end-effector to be used.
b) Calculate the distance (D) from the CG to the mounting face of the tool plate (example below).
c) Calculate the weight (W) of the heaviest end-effector.
d) Multiply W by D to get an approximate static moment (M) (or a moment based on one G of acceleration).
e) Select a tool changer with a static moment capacity equal to or greater than M.

Robots produce moments two to three times higher than the calculated static moment (M) due to their high acceleration. The selected tool changer must be designed to handle dynamic moments three times higher than their static moment ratings.

Selecting Appropriate Utility Modules and Accessories
Once a tool changer model is selected, it is necessary to determine what utilities must be passed from the robot, through the tool changer, to the end-effector. These may include, but are not limited to: Pneumatics, electrical signals, fluids, high power for welding, field bus such as DeviceNet, servo power and signals, ultrasonic, or hydraulics. Some tool changers are designed to pass utilities through the body, while other utilities are passed through attached modules.

Conclusion
Robotic tool changers save money by increasing robotic productivity and flexibility. They increase run time by facilitating automatic tooling changes and increase manufacturing efficiency. Tool changers minimize downtime by expediting tooling maintenance and replacement. They provide a seamless transition and introduction of new tooling, while minimizing equipment idle time. Selecting a tool changer model and configuration requires application-specific information about the load created by the end-effector and its required utilities. Suppliers can assist with load calculation, tool changer model selection, and utility module selection.

For more information, visit ATI Industrial Automation at www.ati-ia.com.



Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Most Emailed Articles

  1. ASSEMBLY Planbook: Lean Automation Is Not an Impossible Dream
  2. Little Lessons from the Big Boys
  3. The Sky is Falling—Not!
  4. Sci-Fi on the Way to Reality?
  5. Ensuring Effective Robotic Dispensing
  6. Select the Right Test Method to Leak Test Your Products
  7. Leak Testing: Appliances Pose Unique Challenges
  8. Moisture-Sensitive Devices
  9. Plastic Rules
  10. Soldering the Unsolderable

Top Searches

  1. Lean Workstation
  2. leak testing
  3. torque
  4. lean
  5. wave solder
  6. Plants
  7. model t
  8. fuel cell
  9. robots
  10. ritter

Most Popular Articles

  1. Mind the Gap 2/20/08
  2. Leading Lean: Build on Your Success 12/17/07
  3. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builderís Success 5/25/07
  4. Ball Grid Array Soldering 1/25/08
  5. Putting the Squeeze on Rivets 12/17/07
  6. Nanotechnology Transforms Lithium-ion Batteries 2/4/08
  7. Successful Design For Assembly 2/26/07
  8. Leading Lean: Make Everything Visual 6/25/07
  9. Leading Lean: Your Lean Library 11/27/07
  10. Select a Workstation for Lean Manufacturing 7/16/07
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy