Assembly Blog

Hoffman144b
President, InterTech Development Co., Skokie, IL

Hoffmann on Testing: Software for Everything...Really?

If the assumptions are wrong, the conclusions are not likely to be very good.

February 14, 2012
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+

A wise engineer once remarked that, “If the assumptions are wrong, the conclusions are not likely to be very good.” We engineers buy into that, right?

After all, we are logic-driven, faithfully following good mechanical and algorithmic processes to an appropriate solution. In this case, designing a leak test or solving a test problem on a high-speed production line. Then someone brings a software guy in the room...

Unfortunately, some technical types start out with the wrong assumption: That software can fix problems often caused by product dynamics or defects in tooling. When the root problem is mechanical in nature, you have to get to the underlying issues.

Still, they persist in seeking an easy way out—like using software to compensate for mechanical factors they probably don’t understand. This assumption is likely to introduce further errors into the process.

This will surely be the case anytime a fixed off-set is used to compensate for a variable effect, such as seal creep in a leak test fixture or fluctuating signals from a damaged torque sensor.

When an arbitrary function is used to compensate for a variable effect of indeterminate function, such as temperature compensation using an average of readings, well, those assumptions are probably not going to be fruitful, either.

As engineers we should prefer conclusions based on solid analysis of the actual situation. That’s why upfront consideration of real-world test requirements, which may include detailed feasibility and correlation studies, will always yield a best-practice approach.

The beauty of such analysis is that it lowers production line inefficiencies, while being more cost-effective. It’s also a process and benefit that software can’t provide. One of the more straightforward ways to optimize production uptime is by adding electronically self-calibrating leak testers that automatically validate entire test systems while they are in operation.

These are the kind of things you can’t do with off the shelf software. Really.


Jacques Hoffmann is president of InterTech Development Co., which designs and builds equipment for leak testing, functional testing and test-centric assembly. He can be reached at 847-679-3377.

 

Editor’s note: “Hoffmann on Testing” is part of a series of guest spots by industry experts that will appear regularly on ASSEMBLY’s blog page. Check back frequently to read more commentaries from Jacques, as well as contributions on automated assembly systems, machine vision, robotics and ergonomics.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Cody Steele
February 15, 2012
I agree. It sounds a lot like Deming's funnel experiment. Fixing something that's not the real problem inevitably makes things worse. http://tinyurl.com/837xu2a —Cody Steele, Statistical Communications Specialist, Minitab, State College, PA

Debi Anderson
February 15, 2012
Yes. Analysis is only as good as the data that is input. If you don't understand or look at the mechanics of the process the data is flawed. —Debi Anderson, engineer, Aero Brake & Spares Inc., Austin, TX

Ron Scicluna
February 23, 2012
I think the goal of test and assembly software is to “look for” failures identified through an FMEA. This analysis is the design and production engineer’s best guess as to what unacceptable results might look like and what material or process discrepancy is the likely culprit. If designed right, the software should be able to identify a performance trend and, based on the FMEA breakdown, point out the most likely cause. Apart from that there is no substitute for honest to goodness root-cause analysis. The results can be used to improve materials and assembly processes. Of course, the software can’t be any smarter about potential failures than the FMEA (and the programmer) tells it to be. —Ron Scicluna, PPI Consulting Group, Chicago

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

eCards

eCards including Assembly Lubricant, Metric Components and Part Manufacture and Power/Hand Tools and Accessories!

Podcasts

John Sprovieri was featured on Manufacturing Revival Radio, speaking about best practices and techniques, emerging trends in manufacturing, and the impact that the new Baxter Robot will have on manufacturers, as well as the capital spending outlook for 2013 and 2014.

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Assembly Magazine

ASM May 2013 cover

2013 May

The 2013 May Assembly includes a cover story about considerations for selecting vision systems and articles about leak testing, optimizing parts bin layout, and what's new with assembly presses. Check it out today!

Table Of Contents Subscribe

Auto Industry Upturn

Is your company benefitting from the upturn in the auto industry?
View Results Poll Archive

THE ASSEMBLY MAGAZINE STORE

welding.gif
Welding: Principles & Practices

This text introduces students to a solid background in the basic principles and practices of welding.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Assembly Showrooms

ASSEMBLY Showrooms

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40px twitter_40px  youtube_40pxlinkedin_40px