<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>Dymax</title>
    <description>
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="https://dymax.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored" ><strong>Dymax</strong></a> manufactures light-curable adhesives and curing equipment for electronics, medical, and industrial applications, helping engineers improve process efficiency, reliability, and precision through optimized light-curing solutions.</p> 

<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/dymax" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored" ><img src="/ext/resources/Natives/Social_Icons/linkedin.png"></a>&nbsp;&nbsp; 

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/dymaxc" target="_blank" rel="nofollow sponsored" ><img src="/ext/resources/Natives/Social_Icons/youtube.png"></a>]]>
    </description>
    <link>https://www.assemblymag.com/rss/6659</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why UV Intensity Alone Doesn’t Define Curing Performance</title>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Published intensity values don’t always reflect real curing performance. Working distance, emitter design and uniformity can significantly influence results in production environments.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <guid>http://www.assemblymag.com/articles/99975</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/99975-why-uv-intensity-alone-doesnt-define-curing-performance</link>
      <enclosure url="https://www.assemblymag.com/ext/resources/Natives/2026/Dymax-Article-Feature-Image.webp?t=1775750897" type="image/jpeg" length="113493"/>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
