Assembly magazine
Home
Online
Industry Headlines
AssemblyBlog
ASSEMBLYtv
Buyers Guide
Showrooms
Product Review
How To Guides
Webinar
Ask ASSEMBLY
Calendar of Events
eNewsletter
Current Issue
Cover Story
Features
Departments
Digital Edition
Resources
Podcasts
Archives
Job Search
White Papers
Industry Links
Contract Assembly Services
Website Review
E-Cards
Market Research
List Rental
Classified Ads
ASSEMBLY Info
Advertise
Subscribe
About Assembly
Staff Directory
Editorial Calendar
Reprints
2008 Plant of the Year Nomination Form
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
Email this Article Print View
Last Call for "Assembly Plant of the Year" Award Nominations!
2008 Assembly Plant of the Year Award - Call for Entries
by Austin Weber
May 2, 2008



Lean Tools Play a Key Role at Award-Winning Plants

This year, ASSEMBLY magazine is celebrating the 5th anniversary of its Assembly Plant of the Year award. The program was established in 2004 to showcase world-class production facilities located in the United States. The award has been presented to plants owned and operated by Kenworth Truck Co. (Kirkland, WA), Lear Corp. (Troy, MI), Schneider Electric/SquareD (Palatine, IL) and Xerox Corp. (Stamford, CT).

One goal of the award is to highlight the diversity of manufacturing plants and processes that ASSEMBLY covers every month. Indeed, the first four recipients of the Assembly Plant of the Year award are each involved in unique industries: heavy-duty trucks, car seats, electrical distribution equipment and digital printing presses.

They are also located in different parts of the country: Alabama, Kentucky New York and Washington. Two of the plants are relatively new (Kenworth and Lear), while the other facilities are each more than 45 years old (Square D and Xerox). But, despite those differences, they each share something in common: A keen embrace of lean manufacturing principles and a plant-wide desire for continuous improvement.

For instance, at Kenworth’s Renton, WA, plant, kaizen events are common. They have eliminated non-value-added activities and generated significant savings by reducing inventory, scrap and dunnage, as well as relocating parts for easier access and reduced walking distances.

When its customer required a major increase in throughput, a kaizen team at Lear’s Montgomery, AL, plant incorporated a new layout that implemented cellular builds to better utilize floor space, while providing a better flow of materials. After identifying where people needed to be added on the assembly line, simulation models allowed the team to identify the best sequence of operation for the production tasks.

The team of managers and operators then validated the study by conducting actual time studies to ensure that the operations could be performed at takt time. Ultimately, the kaizen was a success, and Lear Montgomery met its customer’s goals, delivering increased productivity through better material flow.

By implementing lean work processes, Xerox’s Webster, NY, plant has also become faster and more flexible. For instance, the plant has adopted a smaller footprint. The size of the shop floor has shrunk from 790,000 square feet to less than 500,000 square feet by consolidating and transforming the facility from three distinct areas into one manufacturing area. The consolidation has simplified material flow and reduced operating costs.

A recent lean initiative at the Square D/Schneider Electric plant in Lexington, KY, involves visual management systems. The plant uses group-level short interval management (SIM) boards to improve productivity. For example, safety performance visuals feature safety crosses that show the number of days worked with no recordable safety accidents. Other visuals depict cross-rotational training assignments, root-cause analysis on repetitive production barriers, and by-hour production barrier logs.

Prior to implementing SIM, many small, repetitive issues were not captured. By focusing on a much smaller time increment, one hour at a time, the plant began documenting production barriers that prevent assemblers from achieving takt time. After issues are captured, they are discussed in each value stream team at the start of a shift, then prioritized and worked to corrective action.

Click here to learn more about the 2008 Assembly Plant of the Year award and find a nomination form.


Austin Weber
webera@bnpmedia.com
Senior Editor


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Most Emailed Articles

  1. ASSEMBLY Planbook: Lean Automation Is Not an Impossible Dream
  2. Little Lessons from the Big Boys
  3. The Sky is Falling—Not!
  4. Sci-Fi on the Way to Reality?
  5. Ensuring Effective Robotic Dispensing
  6. Select the Right Test Method to Leak Test Your Products
  7. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builder’s Success
  8. Leak Testing: Appliances Pose Unique Challenges
  9. Plastic Rules
  10. Soldering the Unsolderable

Top Searches

  1. Lean Workstation
  2. leak testing
  3. torque
  4. lean
  5. wave solder
  6. Plants
  7. model t
  8. fuel cell
  9. robots
  10. ritter

Most Popular Articles

  1. Mind the Gap 2/20/08
  2. Leading Lean: Build on Your Success 12/17/07
  3. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builderís Success 5/25/07
  4. Ball Grid Array Soldering 1/25/08
  5. Putting the Squeeze on Rivets 12/17/07
  6. Nanotechnology Transforms Lithium-ion Batteries 2/4/08
  7. Successful Design For Assembly 2/26/07
  8. Leading Lean: Make Everything Visual 6/25/07
  9. Leading Lean: Your Lean Library 11/27/07
  10. Select a Workstation for Lean Manufacturing 7/16/07
© 2008 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy