Assembly magazine
Home
Subscription Customer Service
Online
Industry Headlines
AssemblyBlog
ASSEMBLYtv
Assembly Radio
Web Extras
Buyers Guide
Showrooms
Product Review
How To Guides
Webinar
Ask ASSEMBLY
Calendar of Events
eNewsletter
Current Issue
Cover Story
Features
Departments
Digital Edition
Resources
Archives
Job Search
White Papers
Industry Links
Website Review
E-Cards
Market Research
List Rental
Classified Ads
ASSEMBLY Info
June 2009 BPA Statement
Subscribe
About Assembly
Staff Directory
Advertise
Reprints
2010 Plant of the Year Nomination Form
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Robot Knows When It Hits a Person

September 11, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Isaac Asimov must be spinning in his grave. In blatant contravention of the sci-fi writer’s first law of robotics, Sami Haddadin’s robot regularly hits him in the face.

The blows are no accident. Haddadin is part of a research team at the German Aerospace Centre Space Agency (DLR) in Oberpfaffenhofen aiming to transform industrial robots from insensitive drones into smart machines that can work alongside humans. He is testing the first industrial robot capable of sensing when it hits someone.

“Accidents happen,” he says. “We have to accept that when people start to work more closely with robots they will sometimes hit people.”

Today’s industrial robots are a far cry from anything people could work with. Safety at a typical car factory, where robots work tirelessly at high speeds penned in behind physical barriers, consists of keeping people and robots apart. If a person breaches a barrier, sometimes an alarm sounds and the robots stop. But if someone was hit, the robots would just soldier on blissfully unaware.

To tackle this, the DLR researchers started by smashing robotic arms weighing up to 2.5 tons into the head of a crash test dummy at different speeds. To the researchers’ surprise, none was capable of delivering a blow rated worse than “very low” on the scale used by the car industry. Roboticists had assumed such impacts would be lethal, says Haddadin.

Although this was reassuring, an industrial robot could still trap or crush a person by being unaware that it had hit them. So the next step was giving a robotic arm the ability to detect an impact and react appropriately.

A person landing a blow feels the shock of the impact thanks to specialized stretch receptors in their muscles and joints. Haddadin has given a robot arm the same “kinesthetic” sense by embedding torque sensors in each of its six joints. Made from a collection of metal foil devices that change their electrical resistance when under tension in a particular direction, they give constant feedback on the direction and magnitude of the forces felt by the arm.

Haddadin recorded the pattern of torque changes his robot arm feels during normal activity and programmed it to stop moving if it senses something unexpected. Then he gamely put the arm to the test, allowing it to hit him in the stomach, chest, forehead and arm at speeds of up to 2.5 meters per second. Luckily, it performed as expected. Though he was “definitely concerned” when the blows began, Haddadin says “it took me only a very short time to get used to them.”

Once it has stopped, the arm uses its motors and torque sensors to support its own weight. This ensures it doesn’t keep moving due to gravity or inertia and cause further harm. Then the arm can simply be pushed aside. “You give it a push and it just floats away. It feels like it weighs only a few grams,” says Haddadin. The robot can feel the direction it is being pushed in and use its motors to help out.

The arm also uses its torque sensors for more sophisticated responses. The direction of an unexpected movement allows it to differentiate a co-worker’s guiding hand from an unintended collision, preventing it from stopping unnecessarily. Meanwhile the magnitude of the movement allows it to tell the difference between a big hit and a soft collision. It responds to the latter with a gentle nudge that signals “get out of my way” to its human co-worker.

You can read more about it here.


|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Most Emailed Articles

  1. Welding: Turning on a Spot
  2. Wind Turbines Demand Reliable Components
  3. In Indiana, Government Jobs Outpace Factory Jobs
  4. AIA: Actuators Facilitate Automatic Welding
  5. The Pros and Cons of Cells
  6. Assemblers Harness Wind Power
  7. Automated Assembly: Get Agile
  8. Robotic Ultrasonic Welding
  9. Automation Profiles: Cabinet Assembly Moves Into 21st Century
  10. Mixed-Mode Manufacturing: Software Strategy Is Everything

Top Searches

  1. Lean Workstation
  2. leak testing
  3. torque
  4. lean
  5. wave solder
  6. Plants
  7. model t
  8. fuel cell
  9. robots
  10. ritter

Most Popular Articles

  1. Mind the Gap 2/20/08
  2. Leading Lean: Build on Your Success 12/17/07
  3. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builderís Success 5/25/07
  4. Ball Grid Array Soldering 1/25/08
  5. Putting the Squeeze on Rivets 12/17/07
  6. Nanotechnology Transforms Lithium-ion Batteries 2/4/08
  7. Successful Design For Assembly 2/26/07
  8. Leading Lean: Make Everything Visual 6/25/07
  9. Leading Lean: Your Lean Library 11/27/07
  10. Select a Workstation for Lean Manufacturing 7/16/07
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback