Assembly magazine
Home
Subscription Customer Service
Online
Industry Headlines
AssemblyBlog
ASSEMBLYtv
Assembly Radio
Web Extras
Buyers Guide
Showrooms
Product Review
How To Guides
Webinar
Ask ASSEMBLY
Calendar of Events
eNewsletter
Current Issue
Cover Story
Features
Departments
Digital Edition
Resources
Archives
Job Search
White Papers
Industry Links
Website Review
E-Cards
Market Research
List Rental
Classified Ads
ASSEMBLY Info
June 2009 BPA Statement
Subscribe
About Assembly
Staff Directory
Advertise
Reprints
2010 Plant of the Year Nomination Form
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Ergonomics: Ford Simulates
by Austin Weber
December 1, 2008

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Digital operators help engineers predict the ergonomic effects of long-term repetitive motions.
Manufacturing engineers at Ford Motor Co. (Dearborn, MI) use digital tools and virtual manufacturing technology to simulate assembly tasks. That helps them predict and eliminate repetitive-stress and other on-the-job injuries.

“The goal of our virtual manufacturing tools is to drive compatibility between product design and the assembly process,” says Dan Hettel, chief engineer for vehicle operations. “We validate each assembly process virtually to ensure that it can be completed with quality.”

Ford engineers combine advanced motion capture technology, which is commonly used in animated movies and digital games, with human modeling software to design jobs that are less physically stressful on operators.

“The benefits are fewer injuries, lower cost of tooling changes, higher quality and faster time to market,” claims Allison Stephens, ergonomics technical specialist with Ford’s vehicle operations manufacturing engineering department. “We’re seeing improvement in every one of those metrics, and our virtual technology is a factor.”

To simulate assembly line tasks, an engineer wears a digitized harness, gloves and headgear. The individual’s size and movements are captured and loaded into a computer program, redrawn as a digital employee and displayed on a large screen.

Human modeling software then determines the ergonomic and quality impact on the assembly line work. Changes can be made quickly to the vehicle or part design to avoid adverse impact.

“With this technology, our digital employees—Jack and Jill—are helping us predict the ergonomic affect of long-term repetitive motions,” says Stephens. “The impact on health and safety metrics, as well as on quality, has been tremendous.”

Ford has been fine-tuning its digital ergonomics work since it began using virtual software tools in 2000. The company is collaborating with the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) as part of a technology consortium. It also participates in the Virtual Soldier Research program with the U.S. Department of Defense (Washington, DC) and the University of Iowa (Iowa City).

“Ford has integrated ergonomic requirements into product design specifications and customer quality checks,” says Hettel. As part of the company’s product development process, the ergonomic data are handed off to the virtual build arena, where the program team—designers, engineers, suppliers and line operators—virtually assemble the vehicle part by part.

“This happens long before the first physical parts are produced and a prototype vehicle is built,” explains Hettel. In fact, the virtual build event takes place before Ford and its suppliers install tooling and set up workstations.

In the virtual build event, Jack and Jill assemble the vehicle part by part on a wall-sized computer screen as the program team scrutinizes the vehicle’s manufacturing feasibility. Engineers evaluate how well the parts go together in the assigned sequence.

Digital technology contributed to high quality early builds of new vehicles such as the Ford Flex and Lincoln MKS. In each case, Hettel says the vehicle reached the prototype build stage with 80 percent fewer manufacturing feasibility issues. Thanks to the virtual tools, parts compatibility on both vehicles was extremely high.


Austin Weber
webera@bnpmedia.com
Senior Editor

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Most Emailed Articles

  1. Welding: Turning on a Spot
  2. Wind Turbines Demand Reliable Components
  3. In Indiana, Government Jobs Outpace Factory Jobs
  4. Assemblers Harness Wind Power
  5. AIA: Actuators Facilitate Automatic Welding
  6. Assemblers Harness Wind Power
  7. The Pros and Cons of Cells
  8. Automated Assembly: Get Agile
  9. Robotic Ultrasonic Welding
  10. Mixed-Mode Manufacturing: Software Strategy Is Everything

Top Searches

  1. Lean Workstation
  2. leak testing
  3. torque
  4. lean
  5. wave solder
  6. Plants
  7. model t
  8. fuel cell
  9. robots
  10. ritter

Most Popular Articles

  1. Mind the Gap 2/20/08
  2. Leading Lean: Build on Your Success 12/17/07
  3. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builderís Success 5/25/07
  4. Ball Grid Array Soldering 1/25/08
  5. Putting the Squeeze on Rivets 12/17/07
  6. Nanotechnology Transforms Lithium-ion Batteries 2/4/08
  7. Successful Design For Assembly 2/26/07
  8. Leading Lean: Make Everything Visual 6/25/07
  9. Leading Lean: Your Lean Library 11/27/07
  10. Select a Workstation for Lean Manufacturing 7/16/07
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback