Assembly magazine
Home
Subscription Customer Service
Online
Industry Headlines
AssemblyBlog
ASSEMBLYtv
Assembly Radio
Web Extras
Buyers Guide
Showrooms
Product Review
How To Guides
Webinar
Ask ASSEMBLY
Calendar of Events
eNewsletter
Current Issue
Cover Story
Features
Departments
Digital Edition
Resources
Archives
Job Search
White Papers
Industry Links
Website Review
E-Cards
Market Research
List Rental
Classified Ads
ASSEMBLY Info
June 2009 BPA Statement
Subscribe
About Assembly
Staff Directory
Advertise
Reprints
2010 Plant of the Year Nomination Form
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Plastic Helps Auto Engineers Tackle Weight Challenge
by Austin Weber
April 6, 2009

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Contrary to popular belief, automobiles have not become lighter during the last 15 years. In fact, they have become 30 percent heavier, due to numerous comfort, safety and entertainment devices that consumers have come to expect. For example, the Volkswagen Golf weighed 800 kilograms when it was introduced in 1974. Today’s version weighs more than 1,200 kilograms.

“By using plastic instead of metal, passenger cars will soon weigh up to 300 kilograms less than they do today,” says Roeland Polet, vice president of Ticona Technical Polymers (Kelsterbach, Germany). “Plastics help shed excess weight without compromising the comfort and safety features that are mainly responsible for the upward weight spiral.”

According to Polet, replacement of metal by plastic or other lightweight materials pays off if the total cost can be reduced by about 15 percent. “Ultimately, car manufacturers have to introduce cost-efficient overall solutions by reducing the number and scope of processing steps, while also reducing the weight of the finished component or system,” he explains.

Polet believes there are numerous opportunities to use plastic for under-the-hood applications. For instance, crankshaft flange seals made of polyphenylene sulfide are 32 percent lighter than their aluminum counterparts.

“In charge-air pipes for turbochargers, weight can be cut by 43 percent,” adds Polet. “Instead of 870 grams for an aluminum pipe, the same part produced from polyphenylene sulfide weighs only 500 grams.”


Austin Weber
webera@bnpmedia.com
Senior Editor

|PrintEmail

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.

Most Emailed Articles

  1. Welding: Turning on a Spot
  2. Wind Turbines Demand Reliable Components
  3. In Indiana, Government Jobs Outpace Factory Jobs
  4. Assemblers Harness Wind Power
  5. AIA: Actuators Facilitate Automatic Welding
  6. Assemblers Harness Wind Power
  7. The Pros and Cons of Cells
  8. Automated Assembly: Get Agile
  9. Robotic Ultrasonic Welding
  10. Mixed-Mode Manufacturing: Software Strategy Is Everything

Top Searches

  1. Lean Workstation
  2. leak testing
  3. torque
  4. lean
  5. wave solder
  6. Plants
  7. model t
  8. fuel cell
  9. robots
  10. ritter

Most Popular Articles

  1. Mind the Gap 2/20/08
  2. Leading Lean: Build on Your Success 12/17/07
  3. Assembly in Action: Supplier Key to Machine Builderís Success 5/25/07
  4. Ball Grid Array Soldering 1/25/08
  5. Putting the Squeeze on Rivets 12/17/07
  6. Nanotechnology Transforms Lithium-ion Batteries 2/4/08
  7. Successful Design For Assembly 2/26/07
  8. Leading Lean: Make Everything Visual 6/25/07
  9. Leading Lean: Your Lean Library 11/27/07
  10. Select a Workstation for Lean Manufacturing 7/16/07
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy
Your Feedback