Assembly Magazine logo
search
Ask ASSEMBLY AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Assembly Magazine logo
  • TRENDS
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Trends
    • News
    • New Products
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace
    • Appliance
    • DFMA Assembly
    • Medical Devices
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Lean Manufacturing
    • Machinery Assembly
    • Electronics Assembly
    • Automotive
  • TECHNOLOGIES
    • Adhesives & Dispensing
    • Assembly Presses
    • Automated Assembly Systems
    • Manufacturing Management
    • Manufacturing Software
    • Motion Control
    • Screwdriving & Riveting
    • Robotics
    • Test & Inspection
    • Plastics & Metal Welding
    • Wire Processing
    • Workstations
  • AUTONOMOUS & ELECTRIC MOBILITY
    • AEM Magazine Archives
    • Autonomy
    • Electrification
    • Mobility Services
    • Assembly & Testing
    • AV/EM News
  • MEDIA
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Podcasts
    • Assembly News Now
    • Assembly TV
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
  • EVENTS
    • Calendar
    • The ASSEMBLY Show
  • MORE
    • Exclusives >
      • Plant of the Year
      • Capital Spending
    • Buyers Guide >
      • Supplier Insights
    • Classifieds
    • Featured Products
    • Newsletters
    • Store
    • White Papers
    • Columns
    • Sponsor Insights
  • INFOCENTER
    • Assembly & Test Solutions
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Sign Up

Then & Now: The Mechanical Marvel

By Austin Weber
February 1, 2002
The first fully automated assembly line was created more than 80 years ago.

Imagine that you’re a contestant on a TV game show. You have a chance to walk away with more than $1 million if you can answer the following question: What year did the first fully automated assembly line debut? Choose one of the following: A)1921; B)1943; C)1959; or D)1966.

If you answered A, you are correct. If you didn’t, don’t feel bad. Most people probably would have guessed C or D.

The first fully automated assembly line was built more than 40 years before computer-controlled equipment transformed the plant floor. Indeed, when the A.O. Smith Corp. automatic frame plant opened its doors in 1921, it was dubbed the "mechanical marvel." Manufacturing engineers from around the world flocked to the factory in Milwaukee to witness it for themselves.

The innovative facility was the first to use fully automated assembly equipment. Its trend-setting machines included a series of high-speed, air-powered riveters capable of mass-producing one automobile frame every 8 seconds. Although the facility and equipment are no longer in operation, the mechanical marvel was designated an historical landmark in 1979 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (New York).

A.O. Smith is a 128-year-old company that has transformed itself several Arial through the years. It has been a leading supplier of bicycle parts, automobile frames, gas transmission pipes, beer barrels, pressure vessels, farm storage silos, water heaters and electric motors. The family-owned business started as a one-man machine shop making metal parts for baby carriages.

In 1903, the company branched out into pressed steel auto frames. Three years later, Henry Ford ordered 10,000 frames for his Model N automobile—the predecessor of the Model T—and demanded them in 4 months. That huge order forced Arthur Oliver Smith (1859-1913) and his engineering team to boost production from 10 frames a day to 100. To meet Ford’s deadline, they created the first automobile frame assembly line in the world with a series of conveyors linking hole punching and riveting stations. The Model N went on to set new sales records that made Ford the country’s leading car producer.

Smith’s son, Lloyd Raymond (1882-1944), picked up where his father left off. He surrounded himself with the most talented engineers he could find and turned them loose on manufacturing challenges. By the early 1920s, A.O. Smith employed 500 engineers and only eight salesmen.

While attending the funeral of an employee, Smith questioned why men must "waste so much of their lives doing the work that machines can do. Men have too much innate ability to be condemned to such uninspired labor." He envisioned an assembly plant where "machines would do the work and workers would attend the machines."

Looking for quick answers on assembly and manufacturing topics? Try Ask ASM, our new smart AI search tool. Ask ASM →

Although the term "automation" had not yet been coined, Smith challenged his team of engineers to devise an automated system that could cut and bend sheet metal, transport the components to the correct stations, rivet them together and move them into a paint shop. The plant was designed on paper 10 Arial before an 84-page patent was finally issued.

After 6 years of development, the 129,000 square foot automated frame plant opened on May 23, 1921. It consisted of four production lines laid out in the form of a rectangle more than one block long. In the middle of the rectangle, a complex of conveyors moved hundreds of parts back and forth between various stations for cutting and shaping, side bar assembly, crossbar assembly, final assembly and painting. Each auto frame required 552 separate operations.

Chain-driven carriages transported the in-process frames. Flat strips of steel came in one end of the line and were fed into a "kick-up" press that gave them their needed contour. The side rails were then mechanically transferred to a second line that punched holes and trimmed each piece. Another series of presses formed the rails into U-shaped channel beams. Side bars were formed in a row of carriages.

The third line was general assembly. "Nailers" used compressed air to blow more than 100 rivets per frame into place in 1 second. The rivets were fed from hoppers located one floor below. The integral frames were then approached on each side by a series of rivet-closing machines that were dubbed the "quadrille of the dragons."

Air-powered riveters formed the heart of the mechanical marvel. In fact, the adjustable riveting machines resembled today’s industrial robots. They were officially known as Smith Type C Riveting Presses and exerted 20 tons of force. Special slots in the floor allowed the riveters to be repositioned for different frame shapes—an early form of flexible assembly.

The last part of the operation involved automatic washing, painting and drying. The mechanical marvel averaged 4 million operations a day. It took 6 to 12 hours for employees to change dies and reset tooling for a different run.

After all the bugs were worked out, the facility could produce 10,000 frames a day. Before the plant was built, A.O. Smith was manufacturing 3,000 frames a days using manual assembly methods that required 2,000 operators. In sharp contrast, the automated assembly line required 90 percent fewer employees.

An article in the November 1930 issue of Fortune magazine described the facility as "one vast integrated machine. Its floor is one solid mass of glittering steel, a thousand shapes which rush and stop, rise and fall, advance and retreat, dancing to some gigantic rhythm, yet to a counterpoint which sets up no vibration. Wide, clean aisles separate the moving groups. There are no towering mechanisms, no belts; the whole upper part of the building is clear."

Although the plant cost $8 million (more than $64 million in today’s economy), it proved to be a wise investment. At the time, General Motors was planning to build its own frames. But, the new automated plant allowed A.O. Smith to offer a cost-effective alternative. As a result, GM dropped its own plans and agreed to a 5-year contract.

The mechanical marvel operated almost continuously until 1958, when A.O. Smith began to phase into welded frame construction. Welded frames proved to be more robust than riveted frames. They could also be more easily redesigned and retooled to meet rapidly increasing model changeovers.

A.O. Smith continued to produce millions of automobile frames until it sold the business unit to Tower Automotive Inc. (Minneapolis) in 1997. At one time, the company manufactured approximately two-thirds of all the frames used in the auto industry. It produced Cadillac frames from 1903 until 1990, one of the longest supplier-manufacturer relationships in automotive history. Both Arthur and Raymond Smith were inducted into the Automotive Hall of Fame (Dearborn, MI) in 1988 for their contributions to the industry.

In addition to automated assembly, the company pioneered other production processes and materials, such as electric arc welding, fiberglass, powdered metal, robotic welding, laser cutting and the fusing of glass to steel. Today, A.O. Smith is a $1.2 billion company that continues to be a leader in applying the latest assembly technology to solve manufacturing challenges at its 41 facilities in eight countries.

KEYWORDS: manufacturing history

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Austinweber headshot
Austin has been senior editor for ASSEMBLY Magazine since September 1999. He has more than 21 years of b-to-b publishing experience and has written about a wide variety of manufacturing and engineering topics. Austin is a graduate of the University of Michigan.

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Made in the U.S.A.

    Consumer Products Manufacturing: Made in the USA

    Supply chain lessons learned during the coronavirus...
    Automated Assembly Systems
    By: Austin Weber
  • Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    In manufacturing, ironclad formulas for success are hard...
    Assembly Presses
    By: Jim Camillo
  • aem0523leader-tesla1.jpg

    Tesla Rethinks the Assembly Line

    Engineers at Tesla Inc. have developed a new process that...
    Automotive Assembly
    By: Austin Weber
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Assembly Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ASSEMBLY audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ASSEMBLY or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • ultrasonic welding
    Sponsored bySonobond Ultrasonics

    Engineering Efficiency in High-Performance Assembly: How Ultrasonic Welding Enhances Throughput, Reliability and Quality

  • UV curing system
    Sponsored byDymax

    Why UV Intensity Alone Doesn’t Define Curing Performance

  • wooden pallets
    Sponsored byLEAN Manufacturing Products

    Eliminating Waste on the Shop Floor: Applying Lean Principles to Improve Manufacturing Efficiency

Popular Stories

ASSEMBLY News Now, episode-30: Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg announces 1 billion investment

Boeing Plans $1 Billion Wichita Investment, Workforce Training Center

GE Appliances Worker on Line

GE Appliances Expands Factory AI With 800 Gemini Enterprise Agents

Watch the latest episode of ANN now!

Events

July 24, 2025

From Shop Floor to CFO: How Manufacturers Are Closing the Loop Between Operations and Finance

On Demand Learn how manufacturers are bridging the gap between the shop floor and ERP systems to gain real-time visibility, streamline operations, and kick-start digital transformation—without waiting years.

Sponsored by:

PicoStratusGreen
July 30, 2025

Buffer Analysis and Design Fundamentals for Manufacturing Excellence

On Demand In this presentation, Dr. Herman Tang shares practical insights from his industry experience and research on buffer management in manufacturing operations.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Difficult Assembly Processes

Which assembly process gives you the most difficulty?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

See More Products
Register for webinar - Modernizing Automotive Assembly: Why Upgrading Legacy MES is a Business Imperative

Related Articles

  • Assembly Then & Now: The Man Behind the Moving Assembly Line

    See More
  • Then & Now: The 1876 Centennial Exposition

    See More
  • Assembly Then & Now: The Dodge Main Plant

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • integration.jpg

    Integration of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering with IoT: A Digital Transformation

  • foreman.jpg

    The Foreman on the Assembly Line

  • history.jpg

    Faster, Better, Cheaper in the History of Manufacturing: From the Stone Age to Lean Manufacturing and Beyond

See More Products

Related Directories

  • ServiceNow

  • Mechanical Simulation

×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the manufacturing industry

Stay in the know on the latest assembly trends.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More?
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing