Assembly Magazine logo
search
Ask ASSEMBLY AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Assembly Magazine logo
  • TRENDS
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Trends
    • News
    • New Products
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace
    • Appliance
    • DFMA Assembly
    • Medical Devices
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Lean Manufacturing
    • Machinery Assembly
    • Electronics Assembly
    • Automotive
  • TECHNOLOGIES
    • Adhesives & Dispensing
    • Assembly Presses
    • Automated Assembly Systems
    • Manufacturing Management
    • Manufacturing Software
    • Motion Control
    • Screwdriving & Riveting
    • Robotics
    • Test & Inspection
    • Plastics & Metal Welding
    • Wire Processing
    • Workstations
  • AUTONOMOUS & ELECTRIC MOBILITY
    • AEM Magazine Archives
    • Autonomy
    • Electrification
    • Mobility Services
    • Assembly & Testing
    • AV/EM News
  • MEDIA
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Podcasts
    • Assembly News Now
    • Assembly TV
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
  • EVENTS
    • Calendar
    • The ASSEMBLY Show
  • MORE
    • Exclusives >
      • Plant of the Year
      • Capital Spending
    • Buyers Guide >
      • Supplier Insights
    • Classifieds
    • Featured Products
    • Newsletters
    • Store
    • White Papers
    • Columns
    • Sponsor Insights
  • INFOCENTER
    • Assembly & Test Solutions
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Sign Up
IndustriesDFMA Assembly

Design for Additive Manufacturing, Part 3

Here are the most common pitfalls when designing parts for additive manufacturing.

By Nick Allen
asb1222additive1.jpg

Different additive manufacturing processes have different constraints that can determine how easily and consistently they can produce parts. Photo courtesy 3DPRINTUK

asb1222additive3.jpg

Our guaranteed minimum wall thickness for unfinished parts is 1 millimeter. For parts that will be polished or shot-peened, our guaranteed minimum thickness is 1.5 millimeters. Photo courtesy 3DPRINTUK

asb1222additive4.jpg

Powder can fuse into holes and channels with small diameters. To prevent this, we recommend a minimum diameter of 3 millimeters. Photo courtesy 3DPRINTUK

asb1222additive1.jpg
asb1222additive3.jpg
asb1222additive4.jpg
December 12, 2022

Different additive manufacturing (AM) processes have different constraints that can determine how easily and consistently they can produce parts. Some constraints are universal across the different processes; some are more specific to the type of process used. At 3DPRINTUK, we specialize in powder bed fusion (PBF) processes with polymer materials.

It is essential to understand the technology you are working with to maximize its potential as a production method. With this understanding, it is possible to design around the general limitations of AM, as well as the specific constraints of your particular process. Designing for AM requires a different approach than designing for traditional manufacturing methods.

While we are strong advocates of AM and what it can achieve, the key to our success during the past decade has been our understanding of the process’s limitations and how we manage expectations.

To that end, here are the most common pitfalls when designing parts for AM and, in particular, the selective laser sintering and multi-jet fusion processes.

 

WALL THICKNESS

Wall thickness is a critical consideration for parts being designed for AM, both in terms of the part itself and any post-processing that may be required. Our maximum recommended wall thickness will prevent shrinkage deformation during cooling, while our minimum recommended wall thickness will ensure parts withstand automated post-processing techniques without damage.

Our guaranteed minimum wall thickness for unfinished parts is 1 millimeter, but there are exceptions when this thickness should be increased. Exceptions include vulnerable unsupported structures, skeletal structures, weight-bearing walls, and specific performance requirements.

For parts that will be polished or shot-peened, our guaranteed minimum thickness is 1.5 millimeters. Again, there are exceptions for vulnerable unsupported features, weight-bearing walls and performance requirements.

Looking for quick answers on assembly and manufacturing topics? Try Ask ASM, our new smart AI search tool. Ask ASM →

Our recommended maximum wall thickness is 5 millimeters. Anything beyond 10 millimeters may require the wall of the part to be hollowed out to prevent shrinkage deformation, build failures and excessive print times.

In most cases, a 3-millimeter wall thickness provides a rigid part with a little or no flex, while a 1.5-millimeter wall thickness results in some flex, depending on length and structural support.

 

SURFACE DETAILS

The nature of PBF processes mean that parts come off the printer with a granular surface. Sometimes, layer lines can be visible. Post-processing options, such as polishing or shot-peening, are often required to achieve a smoother finish more akin to injection molded parts. If specific surface details are designed into a product or part, certain design rules should be followed.

Surface details can vary depending on which surface they have been applied to. The top side may include a raised burr of the laser around the outer edge, while the underside can appear more muted. For the best and most consistent visibility, design text or features to appear on the side surfaces.

Other recommendations are as follows:

  • Features should be a minimum of 0.5 millimeter wide and 0.5 millimeter deep.
  • Embossed text is safer than raised text, since small details and edges can be vulnerable to break.
  • Avoid embossing or extruding surface details too far. Try to keep them to around 0.5 millimeter. Anything further out can be damaged during post-processing. Anything too deep can trap powder.

 

SOLID VS. HOLLOW PARTS

Hollowing can prevent the part from deforming and achieve higher levels of accuracy and reliability. However, PBF processes work with powdered material, and hollow parts can trap powder within the sintered shell. When designing a hollowed part, there are a few design options that avoid trapped powder, such as designing-in escape holes, removing unwanted surfaces altogether, or including a locating lid.

We will automatically hollow larger parts before printing when they are above 15 to 20 millimeters on a case-by-case basis. If you want us to print it solid, let us know and we can advise accordingly.

 

INTERLOCKING AND MECHANICAL PARTS

When designing interlocking or mechanical parts, including a clearance between parts is essential. This is because a gap between the sintered surfaces prevents them from fusing together. The tighter the tolerance, the more likely it is to fuse together.

Some general design rules are as follows:

  • In nearly all cases, a clearance between moving parts must be at least 0.5 millimeter for us to guarantee a result.
  • Contacting surfaces must be kept to 5 millimeters or less to guarantee them not fusing. Longer shafts will likely be too difficult or impossible to free up.
  • Think about how the trapped powder between the surfaces can be removed. Sometimes a little force is enough to remove the powder, but designing powder removal holes may also be needed.
  • Dense volumes can refract more heat and harden the powder between the surfaces. This means that the clearance may have to be increased if this is flagged as a concern or if the part does not function as intended.

 

HOLES AND CHANNELS

One of the key advantages of AM is the ability to design and produce complex geometries without the need for expensive tooling. However, designers still have to be mindful of the complexities they design-in to parts, especially when it comes to holes and channels running through the part. The nature of PBF processes comes into play here—specifically the amount of heat that parts are exposed to during the build process. Thus, powder can fuse into holes and channels with small diameters. To prevent this, we recommend to design them greater than 3 millimeters.

For internal channels over 50 millimeters long, the same problem applies. It can be difficult to remove all of the powder. We recommend a diameter greater than 5 millimeters for internal channels. The same rule applies to curved holes, too.

 

MAXIMUM BUILD SIZE

3DPRINTUK will always position parts in a build to get the best possible outcome —no matter the original orientation of the file. The only exception to this is if a client locks the orientation while placing the order.

For more information, visit www.3dprint-uk.co.uk.

This might seem like an obvious one, but all additive manufacturing equipment—whether desktop, mid-range or full production systems—have a maximum build size. You would be amazed how often this can be overlooked!

Across our fleet of industrial-scale 3D printers, our maximum build sizes are:

SLS, PA12, 300 by 300 by 600 millimeters.

MJF, PA12, 350 by 255 by 350 millimeters.

SLS, flexible TPU, 180 by 120 by 120 millimeters

 

Editor’s note: This is the last of a three-part series about design for AM. Parts 1 and 2 explored the advantages additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing processes, and the pitfalls to avoid to achieve the most successful outcomes.

KEYWORDS: additive manufacturing

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Nick Allen // Managing Director // 3DPRINTUK // London

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Made in the U.S.A.

    Consumer Products Manufacturing: Made in the USA

    Supply chain lessons learned during the coronavirus...
    Automated Assembly Systems
    By: Austin Weber
  • Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    In manufacturing, ironclad formulas for success are hard...
    Assembly Presses
    By: Jim Camillo
  • aem0523leader-tesla1.jpg

    Tesla Rethinks the Assembly Line

    Engineers at Tesla Inc. have developed a new process that...
    Assembly and Testing
    By: Austin Weber
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Assembly Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ASSEMBLY audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ASSEMBLY or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • ultrasonic welding
    Sponsored bySonobond Ultrasonics

    Engineering Efficiency in High-Performance Assembly: How Ultrasonic Welding Enhances Throughput, Reliability and Quality

  • UV curing system
    Sponsored byDymax

    Why UV Intensity Alone Doesn’t Define Curing Performance

  • wooden pallets
    Sponsored byLEAN Manufacturing Products

    Eliminating Waste on the Shop Floor: Applying Lean Principles to Improve Manufacturing Efficiency

Popular Stories

Ferrari

Ferrari Unveils Four-Door EV

ASSEMBLY News Now, episode-30: Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Robots working at Toyota Plant in Japan

Toyota Deploys Geekplus Robots for Factory Material Handling

Watch the latest episode of ANN now!

Events

July 24, 2025

From Shop Floor to CFO: How Manufacturers Are Closing the Loop Between Operations and Finance

On Demand Learn how manufacturers are bridging the gap between the shop floor and ERP systems to gain real-time visibility, streamline operations, and kick-start digital transformation—without waiting years.

Sponsored by:

PicoStratusGreen
July 30, 2025

Buffer Analysis and Design Fundamentals for Manufacturing Excellence

On Demand In this presentation, Dr. Herman Tang shares practical insights from his industry experience and research on buffer management in manufacturing operations.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Difficult Assembly Processes

Which assembly process gives you the most difficulty?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

See More Products
ebook

Related Articles

  • asb1122addditive2.jpg

    Design for Additive Manufacturing, Part 2

    See More
  • asb1022additive1.jpg

    Design for Additive Manufacturing

    See More
  • Design for Additive Manufacturing

    Design for Additive Manufacturing

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • additive manu.jpg

    Additive Manufacturing, Second Edition

  • additive.jpg

    Additive Manufacturing: Fundamentals and Advancements

  • 0001219.jpeg

    3D Printing 2E, Understanding Additive Manufacturing

See More Products
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the manufacturing industry

Stay in the know on the latest assembly trends.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More?
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing