Assembly Magazine logo
search
Ask ASSEMBLY AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Assembly Magazine logo
  • TRENDS
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Trends
    • News
    • New Products
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace
    • Appliance
    • DFMA Assembly
    • Medical Devices
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Lean Manufacturing
    • Machinery Assembly
    • Electronics Assembly
    • Automotive
  • TECHNOLOGIES
    • Adhesives & Dispensing
    • Assembly Presses
    • Automated Assembly Systems
    • Manufacturing Management
    • Manufacturing Software
    • Motion Control
    • Screwdriving & Riveting
    • Robotics
    • Test & Inspection
    • Plastics & Metal Welding
    • Wire Processing
    • Workstations
  • AUTONOMOUS & ELECTRIC MOBILITY
    • AEM Magazine Archives
    • Autonomy
    • Electrification
    • Mobility Services
    • Assembly & Testing
    • AV/EM News
  • MEDIA
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Podcasts
    • Assembly News Now
    • Assembly TV
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
  • EVENTS
    • Calendar
    • The ASSEMBLY Show
  • MORE
    • Exclusives >
      • Plant of the Year
      • Capital Spending
    • Buyers Guide >
      • Supplier Insights
    • Classifieds
    • Featured Products
    • Newsletters
    • Store
    • White Papers
    • Columns
    • Sponsor Insights
  • INFOCENTER
    • Assembly & Test Solutions
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Sign Up
Automated Assembly SystemsRobotics Assembly

Uncovering Hidden Capacity Using OEE

By monitoring OEE, assemblers can reduce process variability, changeover times, overtime expenditures and capital investments.

By Corey Vodvarka
Uncovering Hidden Capacity Using OEE
Uncovering Hidden Capacity Using OEE

One reason OEE is such a valuable measure is that it allows manufacturers to look at all sources of lost time and lost production. Photo courtesy Blue Water Controls LLC

Uncovering Hidden Capacity Using OEE
Uncovering Hidden Capacity Using OEE
October 20, 2017

Many companies routinely hit capacity constraints and immediately consider adding overtime for existing workers, hiring workers for a new shift, or buying a new line. Relatively few companies have made the more modest investment that is required to optimize the performance of their existing lines.

As the global marketplace changes, it has become increasingly clear that stakeholders put a large value on an organization’s ability to maximize productivity and utilization. With consumers demanding lower and lower prices, a reduction in operating costs and cost of goods sold has never been more needed to stay competitive.

One way to measure a plant’s performance and productivity is with overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). This article will talk about OEE and how to fully use this key performance indicator to your benefit.

Many manufacturing companies have been measuring the efficiency of their lines and workcells in such a way as to mask many of the causes of lost efficiency. Over a period of years, management focuses on the numbers being reported and is no longer thinking about what is included or excluded from the measurement.

One reason OEE is such a valuable measure is that it allows manufacturers to look at all sources of lost time and lost production. OEE can deliver accurate and actionable intelligence to decision makers for significant productivity improvement.

Before we delve into OEE and how to best calculate it, let’s briefly discuss the various time categories involved in the equation.

The first is “total available time.” This is the time that the plant is open and theoretically could be producing goods.

Looking for quick answers on assembly and manufacturing topics? Try Ask ASM, our new smart AI search tool. Ask ASM →

The second is “planned production time.” This is total available time minus planned shutdown time. Planned shutdown time could include meal breaks, holiday shutdown and scheduled maintenance.

The third is “operating time.” This is the difference between planned production time and the time lost to downtime. Downtime events include equipment breakdowns, unscheduled maintenance, setup time and changeover. This is included in calculating OEE.

The fourth is “net operating time.” This is the difference between operating time and time lost to a reduction in speed. Speed reduction events include operating equipment at below rated speed (increased cycle time), frequent short-lived stoppages not requiring maintenance, and certain operator errors. This is also included when calculating OEE.

Lastly, there’s “productive time.” This is the difference between net operating time and the time lost to quality issues. Quality loss includes rejected and reworked products. This, too, is included when calculating OEE.

 

How Is OEE Calculated?

By definition, OEE is the product of availability, performance, and quality percentages:

OEE = Availability * Performance * Quality.

Availability is a measure of downtime losses. Performance is a measure of speed losses. Quality is a measure of defect losses.

Each one of these OEE components represents losses that result in a reduction of operating time. We begin with total available time and subtract time losses due to availability (downtime), performance (speed), and quality (rejects and rework). Very quickly, one can see the effects of these losses on production time.

By definition then, productive time is a fraction of total available time. By measuring and understanding the losses, we can take the actions necessary to increase productive time as much as possible.

Now, let’s talk about the most common losses related to the various OEE categories.

Availability is typically reduced by planned and unplanned events, such as changeovers, sanitation and cleaning, preventive maintenance, meetings, training, startup and shutdown, parts shortages, facility problems (power outages, for example), and capital projects.

Performance is typically reduced by:

  • Running a production system at a speed lower than the theoretical run rate for that assembly on that line or machine.
  • Brief stops, such as jams, overloads, gaps in components on the line, or other faults that can be cleared without maintenance intervention. Many lines have 1,000 or more short stops per week, which result in a massive reduction of output.

Planned shutdown time, or time when production is not needed, is normally excluded from OEE calculations.

Quality is typically reduced by any product that is rejected or must be reworked.

 

Real-World Example

Now, let’s take a look at how OEE is calculated with a real-world example.

Here are the variables:

Total time: The process is scheduled to work five days a week, 24 hours each day, for a total of 7,200 minutes.

Downtime: The machine stopped for whatever reason 1,440 minutes.

Cycle time: 1.5 minutes per unit.

Good units: In five days, 2,880 pieces.

Defective units: In five days, 240 defective pieces.

Now we can calculate availability, performance and quality:

A = (Total Time – Downtime) / Total Time.

A = (7,200 minutes – 1,440 minutes) / 7,200 minutes = 80 percent.

P = [(Good Units + Defect Units) * Cycle Time] / (Total Time – Downtime).

P = [(2,880 pieces + 240 pieces) * 1.5 minutes / piece] / (7,200 minutes – 1,440 minutes) = 81.5 percent.

Q = Good Units / (Good Units + Defect Units).

Q = 2,880 pieces / (2,880 pieces + 240 pieces) = 92.3 percent.

Going back to our main equation, OEE = A * P * Q, we get:

OEE = 80 percent * 81.5 percent * 92.3 percent = 60 percent.

However, there are several shortcuts to calculating OEE. The simplest and easiest is this:

OEE = (Good Units * Cycle Time) / Total Time.

In our example, then:

[2,880 pieces * (1.5 minutes / piece)] / 7,200 minutes = 60 percent.

Let’s look at a slightly more complex real-world example at a canned food plant. Here are the numbers:

  • Average line efficiency is 88 percent using the traditional way of measuring efficiency, in which availability and short stops failures are not counted.
  • OEE calculation time period is three days, or 4,320 minutes.
  • Time not scheduled is 1,230 minutes. The plant operates two shifts per day. Over three days, the line should be unused for 24 hours (1,440 minutes). But, looking at the time cards, with overtime, the actual time not scheduled is 20.5 hours (1,230 minutes).
  • Planned production time is 3,090 minutes (4,320 minutes - 1,230 minutes).
  • The theoretical production rate of the product is 500 cans per minute.
  • First pass yield is 1,027,500 cans. This number comes from the production report; it is not calculated.
  • Calculated OEE is 66.5 percent.
  • Looking at our example, you can see how a few small changes can have a significant impact. For example:
  • By reducing setup times (making a small investment in tooling, establishing best practices, and training workers), availability improves from 80 percent to 85 percent.
  • By identifying and resolving the five most serious causes of short stops, performance improves from 84 percent to 86 percent.
  • By identifying the No. 1 cause of rejects and resolving it, quality improves from 99 percent to 99.2 percent.

Compound these small improvement numbers and OEE jumps from 66.5 percent to 72.5 percent. This six-point improvement of OEE is a 9 percent improvement in the overall value. This means that the canned food plant can now produce 9 percent more product with the same assets in the same time, or if demand is fixed, produce the same quantity with a 9 percent reduction in operating costs.

In sum, our canned food plant can produce an additional 43,200 cans daily with the same assets and costs ($32,400 per day), resulting in a yearly addition of $11.3 million in revenue. In addition, the plant can work 95 fewer shifts per year (when running 24/7, 350 days per year).

For more information on manufacturing software, call Parsec Automation at 714-996-5302 or visit www.parsec-corp.com.

KEYWORDS: factory automation Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Corey Vodvarka, Director of Manufacturing Consulting, Parsec Automation Corp., Anaheim, CA

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Made in the U.S.A.

    Consumer Products Manufacturing: Made in the USA

    Supply chain lessons learned during the coronavirus...
    Automated Assembly Systems
    By: Austin Weber
  • Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    In manufacturing, ironclad formulas for success are hard...
    Assembly Presses
    By: Jim Camillo
  • aem0523leader-tesla1.jpg

    Tesla Rethinks the Assembly Line

    Engineers at Tesla Inc. have developed a new process that...
    Automotive Assembly
    By: Austin Weber
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Assembly Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ASSEMBLY audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ASSEMBLY or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • ultrasonic welding
    Sponsored bySonobond Ultrasonics

    Engineering Efficiency in High-Performance Assembly: How Ultrasonic Welding Enhances Throughput, Reliability and Quality

  • UV curing system
    Sponsored byDymax

    Why UV Intensity Alone Doesn’t Define Curing Performance

  • wooden pallets
    Sponsored byLEAN Manufacturing Products

    Eliminating Waste on the Shop Floor: Applying Lean Principles to Improve Manufacturing Efficiency

Popular Stories

ASSEMBLY News Now, episode-30: Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Volvo Redesigns EV Manufacturing

Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg announces 1 billion investment

Boeing Plans $1 Billion Wichita Investment, Workforce Training Center

automated consumer goods assembly system

Best Practices for Cycle Time Optimization

Watch the latest episode of ANN now!

Events

July 24, 2025

From Shop Floor to CFO: How Manufacturers Are Closing the Loop Between Operations and Finance

On Demand Learn how manufacturers are bridging the gap between the shop floor and ERP systems to gain real-time visibility, streamline operations, and kick-start digital transformation—without waiting years.

Sponsored by:

PicoStratusGreen
July 30, 2025

Buffer Analysis and Design Fundamentals for Manufacturing Excellence

On Demand In this presentation, Dr. Herman Tang shares practical insights from his industry experience and research on buffer management in manufacturing operations.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Difficult Assembly Processes

Which assembly process gives you the most difficulty?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

See More Products
Register for webinar - Modernizing Automotive Assembly: Why Upgrading Legacy MES is a Business Imperative

Related Articles

  • Vermeer Gets Leaner With OEE

    See More
  • OEE and Wire Processing

    OEE and Wire Processing

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • value stream.jpg

    Using Hoshin Kanri to Improve the Value Stream

  • Technology Of Machine Tools

  • flexible manu.jpg

    Flexible Manufacturing Systems

See More Products
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the manufacturing industry

Stay in the know on the latest assembly trends.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More?
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing