Assembly Magazine logo
search
Ask ASSEMBLY AI
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Assembly Magazine logo
  • TRENDS
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Trends
    • News
    • New Products
  • INDUSTRIES
    • Aerospace
    • Appliance
    • DFMA Assembly
    • Medical Devices
    • Green Manufacturing
    • Lean Manufacturing
    • Machinery Assembly
    • Electronics Assembly
    • Automotive
  • TECHNOLOGIES
    • Adhesives & Dispensing
    • Assembly Presses
    • Automated Assembly Systems
    • Manufacturing Management
    • Manufacturing Software
    • Motion Control
    • Screwdriving & Riveting
    • Robotics
    • Test & Inspection
    • Plastics & Metal Welding
    • Wire Processing
    • Workstations
  • AUTONOMOUS & ELECTRIC MOBILITY
    • AEM Magazine Archives
    • Autonomy
    • Electrification
    • Mobility Services
    • Assembly & Testing
    • AV/EM News
  • MEDIA
    • Ask ASSEMBLY AI
    • Podcasts
    • Assembly News Now
    • Assembly TV
    • Webinars
    • eBooks
  • EVENTS
    • Calendar
    • The ASSEMBLY Show
  • MORE
    • Exclusives >
      • Plant of the Year
      • Capital Spending
    • Buyers Guide >
      • Supplier Insights
    • Classifieds
    • Featured Products
    • Newsletters
    • Store
    • White Papers
    • Columns
    • Sponsor Insights
  • INFOCENTER
    • Assembly & Test Solutions
  • EMAGAZINE
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Sign Up
TechnologiesManufacturing SoftwareTest and Inspection Assembly

Festive FEA: Drop Testing a Candy Cane

Candy Cane Stripes.jpg
December 23, 2024

By Brandon Finney

Ho, ho, ho. 'Tis the season for festive engineering. This year, I decided to put my finite element analysis (FEA) skills to work on a seasonal icon: the candy cane.

We all know the perils that follow once you see your beloved candy cane fall and shatter. With Ansys LS-Dyna, I set out to simulate what happens when a candy cane falls onto a rigid surface.

To capture the candy cane's iconic stripes into the model, I utilized mesh morphing. Although the candy cane's twisting introduced some skewing in the elements, we embraced the festive spirit and made the engineering assumption that this was acceptable. Hopefully this keeps us off Santa’s naughty list!

I started this project with a candy cane plan—a sweet little profile to fit in my hand. A cylinder came next, with a mesh oh so fine, to twist into something quite festive, divine.

Some profiles I made to help with the task, for morphing the mesh—it’s easy, just ask!

The stripes now appear in a classic design. They twist and they shimmer, a sight so fine.

With morphing complete, the mesh is just right. This candy cane’s ready—it’s quite the delight!

Looking for quick answers on assembly and manufacturing topics? Try Ask ASM, our new smart AI search tool. Ask ASM →

To understand the candy cane’s brittle behavior, I performed a simple three-point bend test on a sample. The sample broke around 50N of pressure. I did a quick bend test simulation to help determine the Young’s modulus and fracture stress to use in the drop simulation.

Although there are many material models available in LS-Dyna, a quick search of material databases yielded no results for candy canes. So, to keep things simple I used *MAT_ELASTIC and *MAT_ADD_EROSION to add a sudden failure criterion, since candy canes shouldn’t have much if any permanent deformation before failure. A more sophisticated material model could be built, but in the interest of having more time for family this holiday season, we will keep it simple.

After the simulation, we can output a force vs. displacement curve to help validate our material model. Our simulation showed the break around 47N of force, which closely matches physical testing.

With the material model defined, I simulated the candy cane falling from a height of approximately 6 inches onto a rigid surface. To speed up the simulation time, I set an initial velocity of the candy cane just before impact. The simulation showed the candy cane shattering into pieces, mimicking real-world behavior.

Once the model is built and running, it's easy to test additional load cases for different drop positions. So, for curiosity’s sake, I decided to see what would happen if it were dropped on the end instead of the side. 

The drop tests showed just how brittle candy canes are. While I’ve always known they were fragile, I was surprised to see them break into so many pieces from such a low height.

It might be interesting to revisit this simulation with the plastic wrapping included to evaluate its effect on the results. Simulating the shipping packaging could also add an additional layer of complexity, but for now, let’s enjoy the festive chaos of our shattered candy cane this holiday season.

Brandon Finney is a consulting engineer at Rand Simulation in Owings Mills, MD, specializing in mechanical FEA.

KEYWORDS: finite element analysis test software

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • Made in the U.S.A.

    Consumer Products Manufacturing: Made in the USA

    Supply chain lessons learned during the coronavirus...
    Automated Assembly Systems
    By: Austin Weber
  • Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    Best Practices for Press-Fit Assembly

    In manufacturing, ironclad formulas for success are hard...
    Assembly Presses
    By: Jim Camillo
  • aem0523leader-tesla1.jpg

    Tesla Rethinks the Assembly Line

    Engineers at Tesla Inc. have developed a new process that...
    Electrification
    By: Austin Weber
Manage My Account
  • eMagazine Subscription
  • Assembly Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content is a special paid section where industry companies provide high quality, objective, non-commercial content around topics of interest to the ASSEMBLY audience. All Sponsored Content is supplied by the advertising company and any opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily reflect the views of ASSEMBLY or its parent company, BNP Media. Interested in participating in our Sponsored Content section? Contact your local rep!

close
  • ultrasonic welding
    Sponsored bySonobond Ultrasonics

    Engineering Efficiency in High-Performance Assembly: How Ultrasonic Welding Enhances Throughput, Reliability and Quality

  • UV curing system
    Sponsored byDymax

    Why UV Intensity Alone Doesn’t Define Curing Performance

  • wooden pallets
    Sponsored byLEAN Manufacturing Products

    Eliminating Waste on the Shop Floor: Applying Lean Principles to Improve Manufacturing Efficiency

Popular Stories

Robots working at Toyota Plant in Japan

Toyota Deploys Geekplus Robots for Factory Material Handling

can of soda pop

The “Diet Coke Problem” as Manufacturers Face Experts Retiring

BMW Group

Humanoids Take on New Role at BMW’s U.S. Assembly Plant

Watch the latest episode of ANN now!

Events

July 24, 2025

From Shop Floor to CFO: How Manufacturers Are Closing the Loop Between Operations and Finance

On Demand Learn how manufacturers are bridging the gap between the shop floor and ERP systems to gain real-time visibility, streamline operations, and kick-start digital transformation—without waiting years.

Sponsored by:

PicoStratusGreen
July 30, 2025

Buffer Analysis and Design Fundamentals for Manufacturing Excellence

On Demand In this presentation, Dr. Herman Tang shares practical insights from his industry experience and research on buffer management in manufacturing operations.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Difficult Assembly Processes

Which assembly process gives you the most difficulty?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

Manufacturing Cost Policy Deployment (MCPD) Profitability Scenarios: Systematic and Systemic Improvement of Manufacturing Costs

See More Products
ebook

Related Articles

  • Hoffmann on Testing: A Hole Diameter Is Not a Leak Rate!

    See More
  • FEA Aids Design of Turbine Bearings

    See More
  • Ford Takes a Stand for Better Belt Testing

    Ford Takes a Stand for Better Belt Testing

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Testing Adhesive Joints: Best Practices

  • testing.jpg

    Testing Complex and Embedded Systems

  • characterization.jpg

    Characterization, Testing, Measurement, and Metrology

See More Products
×

Never miss the latest news and trends driving the manufacturing industry

Stay in the know on the latest assembly trends.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Manufacturing Division
    • Store
    • Want More?
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eMagazine
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Marketing Services
    • Reprints
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media, Inc. and BNP Media II, LLC.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing